There is a lot of money that goes into these programs that require expert scientist in their respected fields along with lab equipment to police the many athletes that compete in the games. There is a debate in that alone, whether enough money is being distributed to these programs to work or are they just a waste of money and time. I read an article from VICE sports that from all the testing that is done on these athletes only 1% are ever caught. That number seems really low, which in favor of the test state is a great sign. Athletes are cheating less. However, that is a bit naive to think considering athletes are always willing to push the limits and are risk takers by their natural characteristics. In that same article there was a survey taken by athletes in an anonymous fashion that revealed that over 40% of athletes were on some PED and over 80% have used PEDs at least once. Those results are pretty shocking given the fact that only 1% of athletes that take PEDs are caught. In fact, most of if not all of the big PED scandals has come from a whistler blower. BALCO and biogenesis and so on have all been due to a person going to the press. To this day Lance Armstrong has not tested positive on any drug test he has taken. My professor who taught sports philosophy and ethics showed us a calendar from a cyclist he knows very well. That calendar had all the big cycling events he was going to compete in, as well as when to inject or draw out blood during his training regiment. This cyclist no Lance Armstrong, yet he still is doping just to get that competitive edge. He is ranked 170 in the world at the time I was in class. I did not get a name so I do not know whether he improved, did worse, or got caught.
With that being said and shun a bright light on, I can't ignore the fact that these athletes are not only good at beating each other in competition, but are pros at beating these drug tests. The real threat to these athletes is the drugs they take. These are not FDA approved drugs, in fact who know what else is added to the PED in order to "mask" them from being detected. Those who provide these drugs are not doctors, they are "some guy from the gym or streets" which is terrifying. Simple answer is for athletes to not take them. Which is easier said than done, when Olympic glory is on the line and there is only a 1% chance of getting caught those odds are really great odds in favor of the athlete.
My solution would be to let the drugs flow at the Olympics. Those athletes taking PEDs would still be able to compete as long as they reported what they were using and remain under doctor supervision throughout the year. The athletes who prefer not to take PEDs wont have to feel forced to because they will know who is on them and who isn't. The drug testing will still take place for ALL athletes in competition. However, this time if an athlete is caught there is no punishment. It will be a notification and a reporting on what supplements are being taken. That would hopefully eliminate any other criminal activity that is associated with doping. As for the competition itself both types of athletes should compete side by side. The fascination and awe of a PED free athlete beating an athlete on steroids would cause more of a positive outlook on the sport than the gold medalist being stripped of his or her medal due to a positive drug test. Now that being said there would have to be two forms of earning a medal in an event. A set for non doping athletes and another set for the doping athletes. But for now we shall enjoy and watch the games with fascination and skepticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment